Mon 17 Sep 2007
[KR: ICE and the Census Bureau may need to resolve their public differences before outreach efforts get underway for Census 2010. It will be interesting to see how the undercount in 2010 compares to the one in 2000 (although, how would one figure out the magnitude of the undercount among undocumented immigrants?)]
Official: No immigration raids for ‘10 census
August 17, 2007
Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Census workers know it will be difficult counting illegal immigrants for the 2010 population tally and even tougher if those immigrants are hiding from enforcement agents.
“If you have federal officials going door to door trying to count people, and federal officials going door to door trying to deport people, it doesn’t work,” said Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials.
To make it easier, the Census Bureau wants immigration agents to suspend enforcement raids during the population count, the Census Bureau’s second-ranking official said in an Associated Press interview.
Deputy Director Preston Jay Waite said immigration enforcement officials did not conduct raids for several months before and after the 2000 census. But today’s political climate is even more volatile on the issue of illegal immigration.
Enforcement agents “have a job to do,” Waite said. “They may not be able to give us as much of a break” in 2010.
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokeswoman declined to say whether immigration officials would halt raids. “If we were, we wouldn’t talk about it,” Pat Reilly said.
“For us to suspend that enforcement would probably take a lot more than one meeting,” Reilly said. “We would have to discuss this at the highest levels of both agencies.”
The issue arises as the U.S. struggles to resolve the fate of an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. After Congress failed to pass an immigration overhaul sought by the president, the Bush administration last week said it would step up efforts to enforce immigration laws.
One lawmaker said she thinks “it’s nuts” for the Census Bureau to ask for a break in enforcement.
“I don’t know what country the Census Bureau is living in,” Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., said in a telephone interview from her district. “I can tell them the American people have grown sick and tired of their immigration laws not being enforced. They are not going to tolerate enforcement being suspended for any amount of time.”
The Constitution requires the Census Bureau to count everyone, including illegal immigrants. The once-a-decade population count is then used to apportion seats in Congress and to appropriate billions of dollars in federal spending each year.
Miller has introduced a constitutional amendment that would apportion seats in Congress based only on the number of U.S. citizens in each state.
The Census Bureau plans to approach all federal agencies for help in getting an accurate count, Waite said.
Illegal immigrants are notoriously hard to count, although outside experts estimate that census workers count 85% to 90% of them.
Census workers ask immigrants if they are citizens; they do not ask if they are in the country legally.
“We’re supposed to count every resident. If you go out and ask, ‘Are you here illegally?’ they are going to run,” said Kenneth Prewitt, who directed the Census Bureau during the 2000 census.
Prewitt said the public already is suspicious of government workers knocking on their doors and asking personal questions. Those suspicions are amplified among illegal immigrants, even though personal information collected by Census Bureau is private by law.
Prewitt said immigration officials informally agreed to cooperate with the Census Bureau during the 2000 census by not conducting any large-scale raids.
“If they had a reason to think it was important to carry out an action, they would have done so,” Prewitt said. “But they did offer to cooperate as much as possible so they didn’t create a climate of fear. They did not carry out any major raids.”
Reilly, the immigration enforcement spokeswoman, said she could not confirm any informal agreements to scale back enforcement during the 2000 census.
She said the agency “continued to perform its duty to enforce the nation’s immigration laws by continuing to investigate, pursue and arrest criminal and other egregious violators.”
Vargas said the intense debate over immigration has made immigrants even more suspicious of the government today.
“The Census Bureau has a job to do,” said Vargas, who belongs to a committee that advises the bureau on the 2010 census. “They need to convince people that they need to report themselves to the federal government and that it’s going to remain confidential. That’s a hard sell.”
Supporters of stricter immigration laws said the whole discussion of suspending raids shows that the immigration system is broken.
“If you don’t enforce your laws, this is what you are going to get, one agency asking another agency to subvert the law,” said Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates stricter enforcement of immigration laws.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:38 am
[...] Theory of the Offensive reminds me that I need to read the newly published in English 1978 Foucault lectures, Security, Territory, Population. Speaking of population, this amazing article — in which the Census Bureau asks ICE to refrain from large-scale raids during the 2010 census count — reminds me of Brett Neilson’s contribution to Long Sunday’s democracy jam: To put the matter briefly, the demos of demography is not the demos of democracy, or, in other words, the population is not coincident with the people. There is here a discrepancy between demography and democracy which introduces an internal caesura into the very notion of the demos, and it is on this boundary, I want to suggest, that the borders of the political are drawn. […] What is enumerated in the census is thus the apolitical body of the population as opposed to the political body of the people, which is, in this case and in accordance with the tenets of democracy, imbued with the capacity to decide. [...]